Meet Astro
Chart calculations, prepared explanations, voice and private conversation history now have implementation records. The latest episode separates code, reported verification and remaining limits.
Read the first acceptance gateAstro has gained chart explanations, voice continuity and sourced memory. The next SimSim experiment asks what happens when listening becomes participation: you interrupt, take over the story, and the world responds. Read the proposal and its evidence limits.

Start with the vision, explore what has been made, or follow the decisions behind it. The original documents remain intact.
Navigate real life. Explore possible lives. Read the evolving plan and its open questions.
Explore the master plan ↗Visual concepts, editable assets and tools for the next contribution.
Open the asset collection ↗Thirty rounds of questions, disagreements and decisions. Design review, not player validation.
Follow the review ↗Astro has implementation and recorded release checks. Voice storytelling is the next proposal; a compelling conversation is the starting point, not proof of a complete simulation.
Chart calculations, prepared explanations, voice and private conversation history now have implementation records. The latest episode separates code, reported verification and remaining limits.
Read the first acceptance gateSourced recall, editable memory, workspace documents and storage choices are recorded in the code. Complete recovery, predictive validity and attention routing remain separate work.
Explore memory and attentionEnter a world through voice, intervene naturally and take a turn as storyteller. Save, resume and explore a branch. This interaction is proposed, not shipped; pure play needs no lesson.
Explore the interaction modelThe September 29 records connect Astro development, the attic origin and a new intervention model. The earlier voice-world edition is preserved. Earlier Universe, Protocol, WooWoo and First Light decisions remain part of the story.
Thirty baseline review rounds are complete. The later directions, including Astro-first, have not undergone those reviews. Personal-model implementation and real-player validation remain unproven.
Search across design, research and the complete review history. Every document keeps its readable page, plain-text edition and evidence status.
E07: spontaneous participation, dynamic pacing, storyteller handoff and the smallest voice test. Canonical interaction direction, with memory boundaries and unrun acceptance checks.
Read document ↗Design / progress-and-proposalA week of Astro commits, the childhood storytelling game, and a proposed voice-first SimSim. Recorded implementation and new vision remain distinct.
Read document ↗Design / development retrospective / founder visionThe development history, a childhood storytelling game and the proposed first spoken SimSim episode.
Read document ↗Research / source evidence / retrospectiveAll 14 accessible archive commits and 70 Astro commits, with scope and pinned release evidence.
Read document ↗Design / current-planningThe story, changed priorities and delivery gates: a useful companion, searchable memory, chosen attention windows and optional play.
Read document ↗Design / proposalThe artistic vision, production systems and proposed approach to a studio that learns.
Read document ↗Design / proposalA humane future made by hand. The visual direction, character performance and first asset inventory.
Read document ↗Design / proposalThe 60–90 second proof, native performance targets and human playtest plan.
Read document ↗Research / researchUnity, Unreal, Godot and Blender: current research for a native Mac/PC experience.
Read document ↗Research / researchCanonical 3D sources, controlled variations, motion and a practical asset pipeline.
Read document ↗Research / researchIndependent evaluation, the limits of RL and a stable game supported by a learning studio.
Read document ↗Review / current-planningE07: Astro first, user-owned history and optional SimSim with spontaneous intervention, shared authorship and pure play.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / living-indexThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / living-indexThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / planning-reviewThe recorded planning discussion and synthesis. Design review is not implementation or empirical validation.
Read document ↗Review / historical-reviewedThe exact final reviewed planning text before the September 18 evolution. Thirty completed design reviews; no empirical validation.
Read document ↗Design / current-planningTwelve dated decisions: what changed, why, prior rationale, rejected alternatives and open questions.
Read document ↗Design / experimentalEvent/outcome records, storage and permissions, temporary bridges, Room Mode and evidence-gated model learning.
Read document ↗Design / experimentalA chronological founder exploration: permissioned intersections, real experiences and the smallest SimSim Us test.
Read document ↗Design / experimentalTwo small cards, one invitation, private responses and a mutual reveal. Implementation, privacy and evidence limits.
Read document ↗Research / research / proposalE03 compares the new thesis with the preserved plan, challenges lock-in and sequences small evidence.
Read document ↗Research / research / proposalReplaceable memory and intelligence, scoped context, recovery, intersections and practical privacy research.
Read document ↗Research / research / proposalSolid, portable formats, memory servers and agent tools compared without inventing security or adoption results.
Read document ↗Design / founder vision / planningA 22-part founder-thinking archive, experimental boundaries and the smallest astrologer who knows you.
Read document ↗No matching documents. Try another word or category.
Examples describe intended controls. No automated game-update system is active.
The same public record is available as readable pages, Markdown and structured data. Document status matters: a proposal is not a tested result.
Read the current synthesis, dated decision evolution and preserved historical editions. New founder direction is distinguished from the completed baseline review.