Source A: becoming-astrobot-master-plan-v0-1111.md, internally Becoming + Astrobot Master Plan v0.3; 58,150 bytes; SHA-256 4a07a9eed407380a44ecec2998dee4e00468e4ce1d3c082079889de607ed867f. This is the plan used by Godz 4.
Source B: simsim_master_plan_v0.3.md, 68,908 bytes; SHA-256 7347be0ca35a7b4e0ec0953d75fee275645b67b5e7a3805c9fc8358948969ad5. This is God I's proposed upgrade, attached in simsim.
The original supplied simsim_0.1.md is internally Master Plan v0.2. Godz 3's simsim_0.2.md follows filename numbering and is an independent creative proposal, not a newer authoritative branch.
| Source A ID | Meaning | Related Source B ID | Reconciliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| D01–D17 | Shared core scope and principles, with wording evolution | D01–D17 | Preserve original text and status; specifically distinguish founder openness intent from untested service model |
| D18 | Intended Becoming master brand; replaceable companion; optional Sony route | D18, D19 | Latest founder naming uncertainty supersedes prior brand selection; Sony remains optional hypothesis |
| D19 | Basic readable history and portable saves | D07, D22, D23 | Same portability direction; paid preservation and support are separate proposals |
| D20 | Private story preview, separate generation/publication choices | D24, D25 | Media consent and playable continuation remain later tests |
| D21 | Truthful anonymous access gifts | D21 | Similar intent, preserve source wording and provenance |
| No equivalent new ID | Signature post-G1 Relay | D20 | Earlier source G2 already supports a handoff; signature framing is a proposal |
| BS-003 | Combined master-summary amendment | BS-003–007 | One source groups items that another separates; retain both historical registers |
| Godz 4 BS-004–012 | Later growth/creator/IRL/product-learning proposals | Overlaps B BS-004–007 | Namespace as GZ4:BS-004 etc.; do not overwrite B's existing IDs |
Source B D26–D28 clarify no new G1 backend, separate source/visibility labels, and evidence categories. Carry as proposals with source references, not retroactive approvals.
For the final merged plan, use a new unique master decision namespace plus source cross-references, or retain explicit A:/B:/reviewer: prefixes. Preserve disagreement rather than selecting a document solely by its version label.
The three master-brief attachment variants in the local manifest are byte-identical at 32,972 bytes and SHA-256 be87c60fe73b702cf469bd138cc8ca33b6040864d252a871734ee1348325c81f; duplicate filenames are not independent evidence.
Additional integration lineage
simsim reports an assistant-authored Becoming / simsim — Master Plan v0.4 · review checkpoint, file ID file_000000003958820692de99a6a4f1f8f7, 145,140 bytes at save. This generated file is not directly exposed as a local attachment by read_thread. Do not claim the entire artifact was read or independently hashed.
The exact D22–37 and BS-004–006 entries were returned in Round 02 synthesis response [internal record ID omitted] and are preserved in ROUND_02_SYNTHESIS.md. Namespace them simsim-local-v0.4:. Their future validation labels R1/R2 refer to that document's checkpoint/fork experiments, not completed cross-review rounds R01/R02. Preserve this distinction in the final plan.
Live byte-count verification found Source A has 468 split lines; earlier reported 469 likely counts a terminal blank line differently. Its byte hash is the stable identity; do not treat the line-count presentation difference as a new document.
Direct Astro founder steering and final candidate
- Detailed Astro architecture direction (source retained in the studio record): actual simsim user message[internal record ID omitted], read in full. Weighted goals, plausible trajectories, feedback, optional symbolic lenses, counterpart modes, privacy and a small MVP. Illustrations are not current personal facts or validated predictions.
- Preceding personal-world-model framing (source retained in the studio record): actual user message[internal record ID omitted], read in full. Integrated through actual reviews24–29; implementation and private monitoring were not authorized by these planning notes.
- Round29 candidate (source retained in the studio record): assistant synthesis[internal record ID omitted] and verbatim tail recovery[internal record ID omitted]. The recovered text matches the originally retrieved head; the full candidate was supplied to all three Round30 reviewers.
- The candidate's reference to
ASTRO_MASTER_PROMPT.mdwas not substantiated by supplied contents/version in the audit packet or retrieved attachments. It is excluded as an authority unless independently supplied and read. Minimal explicit handoffs may remain a design proposal. - God's Eye View assessment (source retained in the studio record) records the separate founder-suggested repository check. No installation, runtime benchmark or stack adoption is claimed.
Completed numbered syntheses are planning evidence only. Source-qualified disagreement and unrun test status remain part of the final baseline.
Final lineage
Round 29 candidate: [internal record ID omitted], continued verbatim by [internal record ID omitted]. Round 30 final synthesis: [internal record ID omitted]. Final footer recovered verbatim in delivery repair [internal record ID omitted]. Twenty exact amendments applied once each; escaped paragraph delimiters rendered as newlines. No new review cycle or source authority inferred.