<!-- Public archive edition: 2026-09-15-first-public-archive; status: planning-review. Local paths and operational identifiers omitted. -->

**Round 03 amended baseline — synthesis complete. Completed cycles: 3/30.**

This incorporates the actual Godz I/2/3/4 contributions, God I’s challenge `[internal record ID omitted]`, and Godz 3’s acceptance. These are agreed design proposals, not player-tested findings. R01/R02, both source registers, their crosswalk and First Light’s scope remain intact.

**R03-01 — Preparation enables actions; performed actions produce evidence**

Adopt **Godz3:F-R03-01’s** two concrete preparation stages per specialist. Reject automatic “two mornings = mastery.” Each stage represents completed work; Morning 3 still requires performing the investigation before recording its result.

Merge **Godz2:R03-01**, **Godz4:R03-01** and **GI-R03-XR** into this contract:

| Run | Morning-3 action | Retained evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Stillness specialist | Compare occurrences and mark their interval. | Observed timing and observation conditions; no conclusion about system origin. |
| Craft specialist | Operate the prepared receiver and compare repeated readings. | The actual trace, calibration conditions and demonstrated repeatability. Calibration improvement alone does not prove external geometry. |
| Connection specialist | Revisit an earlier detail and distinguish direct recollection from interpretation. | Attributed testimony, qualifications and any explicitly offered introduction; no automatically verified history or trust. |
| Mixed | Perform both earned elementary actions and compare their findings. | Separately sourced fragments and any labeled hypothesis; neither specialist result is automatically granted. |
| Baseline | Actively inspect and record the scheduled irregularity. | The limited observation actually demonstrated, with meaningful local completion rather than a passive ending screen. |

Preparation remains within existing activities: distinguishing cues, positioning and calibrating the receiver, or hearing and examining the neighbor’s account. No new scene, day, currency or lore is introduced.

**R03-02 — Shortened practice preserves actual completed work**

Adopt **GI-R03-XR’s** correction: shortening describes task scope, not an evidence grade. Reject **Godz I:R03-MR-01’s** automatic familiarity grant and any interpretation of Godz 2’s proposal that discards progress solely because an activity is shortened.

Candidate smaller tasks are identifying one cue, positioning one component or recording one attributed statement. Preserve the completed subtask; advance a preparation stage only when its declared requirements are satisfied. Exact requirements remain provisional.

Assistance meeting the same requirements earns identical credit and evidence. Accessibility is not shortened practice by default. Skipping preserves prior work.

**R03-03 — Keep evidence, interpretation and player knowledge distinct**

Correct Godz I’s claim that one recollection independently corroborates a past occurrence. Independent corroboration requires an actual separate source; none was supplied this round.

Accept Godz 3’s objection to artificially restricting perception. A player may notice a pattern or propose a hypothesis early. Record that honestly without pretending the inference stabilizes equipment or creates observations never performed.

Reject a universal baseline–mixed–specialist certainty ranking. Also reject identical final beliefs as an automatic failure: distinct evidence can reasonably support the same belief.

**Remaining uncertainty and next test**

The precise preparation requirements, local question and appeal of each approach remain unvalidated. Enumerate ordered preparation sequences, including smaller tasks, skips and assistance; check available actions, preserved sources, completion and unsupported specialist grants. Then observe causal understanding, perceived agency and interest in alternatives. Different prose alone is insufficient differentiation.

**Round 04 question:** *Within the existing fictional rain/cooling-grid premise, what single local question does First Light answer, what exactly can each route’s evidence establish or leave uncertain, and what larger mystery remains—without adding lore, another event or a withheld “real ending”?*

Request one short author-only mystery contract. Round 04 has not been performed here.
